Name: Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, (PO No. 10 of ). Country: Pakistan. Subject(s): Civil, commercial and family law. Type of legislation: Regulation. Read, Name, Section, Definition, Cases. Read, Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , 1 , Short title, extent and commencement, Cases · Read, Qanun-e-Shahadat. THE. QANUN‑E‑SHAHADAT ORDER, (X OF ). [28th October, ). CHAPTER V. OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Cases in which secondary.

Author: Kajilmaran Totaxe
Country: Venezuela
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 13 April 2014
Pages: 206
PDF File Size: 10.87 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.72 Mb
ISBN: 976-1-76560-246-8
Downloads: 10273
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shaktigis

Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , 1984.

The evidence is admissible. Documents are to be proved through their authors or scribes or witnesses in whose presence such ware written or signed or as are acquainted with the writing or signatures of the author or through expert evidence or by comparison of signatures or upon admission etc. Travelling of member by the flights whereby the opposition had travelled to and from Islamabad could not be taken as an act of defection. If B qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 receipt of advance amounting to Rs.

Person whose opinion was sought to be given in evidence, must be proved to have special means of knowledge and then alone his opinion would qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 evidence.

The circumstantial evidence required for disqualification on the charge of defection should be such that facts proved must be incompatible with the innocence of the elected representatives and incapable of explanation upon any other reasonable qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 than that of their guilt.

Law states that where any question of custom or right is to qanun-e-shahadatt decided, opinions of qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 who are likely to know of it, are admissible. A I R Cal.

Such copies also had been exhibited without objection. There is a distinction also between proof of a document, upon its being exhibited and its authorship.


The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, (10 of )

Comparison of signature by court Article Defendant had yet to file written statement while application in terms of O. Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document produced: Testimony of such witnesses was not shaken in cross-examination. Witness testifying must be subject to the court. It is also not applicable in arbitration cases. Person who has not qanun-e-shahadat order 1984, if is compelled ogder give evidence and he refuses to give evidence is supposed of guilty of false qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 and if he gives true statement then he may be charged.

The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order,

Financial and future obligations need two males or one male and two females witnesses for conviction. Agreement to sell-Plaintiff is to succeed on the basis of his own evidence qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 not on the basis of weakness of the evidence of the defence-Civil matter is to be decided on the basis of proponderance of evidence and the Court is to consider the entire evidence on record, whether it is of the plaintiff or of both plaintiff and defendant, in order to arrive at correct conclusion-Once the evidence is brought on record, the question qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 burden of proof loses its significance.

Oral evidence of eyewitness: It becomes relevant if it is made voluntarily. Where Will is written and got orddr, shall be enough to prove the existence of relationships.

Privilege in respect of. Opinion of finger-point expert taken on file without qanun-e-shahadat order 1984. A letter written by a deceased member of a merchants firm by which she was chartered to their correspondents in London qanun-e-hsahadat, to whom the cargo was consigned, stating that qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 ship sailed on a given day from Karachi harbour is a relevant fact.


The fact that A absconded after receiving a letter warning him that inquiry was being made for the criminal, and the contents of the letter, are relevant. Remarks attributed to witness were germane to the matter in inquiry and were fully protected.

B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B. Evidence produced by vendees on such question did not inspire confidence. Hearsay evidence is not direct evidence.

Defendant in default of clear objection at appropriate time was precluded from objecting to mode of proof regarding admission of opinion of expert or his examination on commission in revision. A person is said to be acquainted with the handwriting qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 another person when he has seen that person write, or when he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in answer to documents written by himself or under his authority and addressed to that person, or when, in the ordinary course of business, documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually submitted to him.

Previous judgments relevant to bar a second qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 or trial. The qxnun-e-shahadat of experts as to the symptoms produced by the poison by which A is qanun-e-shahadat order 1984 to have died, are relevant. The attesting person must have seen the executant signing the document.